<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>The Pathedral and the Kazoo - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/</link>
    <description>The Pathedral and the Kazoo - Eike Rathke blogging about LibreOffice and the world (what a claim)</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.6 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Nuss: Does your LibreOffice locale need a date acceptance pattern for incomplete date input?</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#c248</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Nuss)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Cool! Thanks!  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 00:26:22 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-guid.html#c248</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>erAck: Does your LibreOffice locale need a date acceptance pattern for incomplete date input?</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#c247</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (erAck)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Thanks, added &#039;D/M&#039; and &#039;D/M Y&#039; to sv_SE.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:30:12 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-guid.html#c247</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Nuss: Does your LibreOffice locale need a date acceptance pattern for incomplete date input?</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#c245</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-Does-your-LibreOffice-locale-need-a-date-acceptance-pattern-for-incomplete-date-input.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=18</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Nuss)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    For sv_SE, besides the ISO way (&quot;Y-M-D&quot;), the most widespread style for dates is &quot;D/M&quot; or &quot;D/M Y&quot;, according to the Swedish Language Council. They also claim D.M.Y is used (however, I haven&#039;t seen that style especially much). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you need a source for this, visit http://www.spraknamnden.se/sprakladan/ShowSearch.aspx?id=id=26089;objekttyp=lan. Be careful with Google translate though, since it puts &quot;rd&quot; on the year in one of the examples.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:24:35 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/18-guid.html#c245</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>erAck: Filho's Infographic of Debian with license exception does not allow use of TDF or LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#c244</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (erAck)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Of course he is.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:56:55 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-guid.html#c244</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Anne Nonymous: Filho's Infographic of Debian with license exception does not allow use of TDF or LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#c243</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Anne Nonymous)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It looks like it&#039;s his own right to license however he wishes his document. He is free as in libre.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:55:45 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-guid.html#c243</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>erAck: Filho's Infographic of Debian with license exception does not allow use of TDF or LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#c241</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (erAck)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I interpret the wording &quot;use of any material of &lt;span title=&quot;The Document Foundation&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;TDF&lt;/span&gt; or LibreOffice in this material or derivatives&quot; the other way around, actually I think he doesn&#039;t want to see the &lt;span title=&quot;OpenOffice.org&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;OOo&lt;/span&gt; gulls replaced by &lt;span title=&quot;LibreOffice&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;LibO&lt;/span&gt; icons, as Debian now packages LibreOffice.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:51:17 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-guid.html#c241</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Chris Cunningham: Filho's Infographic of Debian with license exception does not allow use of TDF or LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#c240</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Chris Cunningham)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    What a remarkably petty move. I&#039;m also somewhat curious as to how Claudio justifies including numerous (C) Pixar headshots in an ostensibly &lt;span title=&quot;Creative Commons&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;CC&lt;/span&gt;-plus-daft-clause work.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:46:40 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-guid.html#c240</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Anonymous: Filho's Infographic of Debian with license exception does not allow use of TDF or LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#c239</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-Filhos-Infographic-of-Debian-with-license-exception-does-not-allow-use-of-TDF-or-LibreOffice.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com ()</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The author of infographic wrote that document should not be used in LO or in any association with &lt;span title=&quot;The Document Foundation&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;TDF&lt;/span&gt;. And what did you do? You posted it on your blog that is copied and published directly on the TDF blog. I hope he doesn&#039;t sue you ... ;)  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 08:58:51 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/19-guid.html#c239</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Eike: LibreOffice date acceptance patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#c237</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Eike)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Currently there is no option to change behavior. Maybe we should offer a possibility to edit the patterns.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:26:17 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-guid.html#c237</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Rainer Bielefeld: LibreOffice date acceptance patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#c236</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Rainer Bielefeld)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi, I believe for most users the new behavior is a great progress, but for me it&#039;s mess, I often have to rework lists with dates, and now I need more or less twice as many keystrokes as before. Is there any trick to get the old behavior back? Auto Replace - Replace list would be really uphill (although worthwhile for me). &lt;br /&gt;
--  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 08:14:23 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-guid.html#c236</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>khagaroth: LibreOffice date acceptance patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#c39</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (khagaroth)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi, it&#039;s nice to see this fixed, depending on type of document, Czech language uses both decimal comma and decimal dot and entering or importing numbers with decimal dots was a huge pain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent a patch (including the partitive month names and some other small changes) for Czech language to the LO dev mailing list. I hope I understood the acceptance patterns correctly. Czech language does have two date standards. One with leading zeros, where the separator is a dot and one without leading zeros, where the separator is a dot+space (or dot+nbsp if typography is applied). And as usual, people don&#039;t follow the rules, so entering dates without leading zeros AND without the space after the dot are pretty common.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:31:04 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-guid.html#c39</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Eike: LibreOffice date acceptance patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#c34</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Eike)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The change is in master only, it quite changes behavior and may need some massaging here and there, so I refrained from pushing it last minute into 3.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, CSV import also benefits from this.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:45:07 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-guid.html#c34</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Stephan van den Akker: LibreOffice date acceptance patterns</title>
    <link>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#c30</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-LibreOffice-date-acceptance-patterns.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.erack.org/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Stephan van den Akker)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Good work, Eike!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a major source of frustration with &lt;span title=&quot;The LibreOffice Spreadsheet Application&quot; class=&quot;serendipity_glossaryMarkup&quot;&gt;Calc&lt;/span&gt; users. Glad to see it sorted out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this already fixed in the latest beta releases of LO 3.5?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this fix also apply when importing CSV files?  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:41:51 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erack.org/blog/archives/8-guid.html#c30</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
